I finished reading East of Eden (1952), by John Steinbeck, this last May--not long after I arrived in India. It's a great book. Here are some quotes and excerpts from it that stood out to me. If you like them, I would definitely recommend reading the book. The whole thing is all that much better.
“It does take a time to get used to a new country. It’s like
being born again and having to learn all over” (p 173).
“’Maybe you’re playing a part on a great stage with only
yourself as audience’” (p 293)
“’Maybe everyone is too rich. I have noticed that there is
no dissatisfaction like that of the rich. Feed a man, clothe him, put him in a
good house, and he will die of despair.” (p 306).
“Humans are caught—in their lives, in their thoughts, in
their hungers and ambitions, in their avarice and cruelty, and in their
kindness and generosity too—in a net of good and evil” (p 411).
“I
remember clearly the deaths of three men. One was the richest man of the
century, who, having clawed his way to wealth through the souls and bodies of
men, spent many years trying to buy back the love he had forfeited and by that
process performed great service to the world an, perhaps, had much more than
balanced the evils of his rise. I was on a ship when he dies. The news was
posted on the bulletin board, and nearly everyone received the news with
pleasure. Several said, ‘Thank God that son of a bitch is dead.’
Then
there was a man, smart as Satan, who, lacking some perception of human dignity
and knowing all too well every aspect of human weakness and wickedness, used
his special knowledge to warp men, to buy men, to bribe and threaten and seduce
until he found himself in a position of great power. He clothed his motives in
the names of virtue, and I have wondered whether he ever knew that no gift will
ever buy back a man’s love when you have removed his self-love. A bribed man
can only hate his briber. When this man dies the nation rang with praise and,
just beneath, with gladness that he was dead.
There
was a third man, who perhaps made many errors in performance but whose
effective life was devoted to making men brave and dignified and good in a time
when they were poor and frightened and when ugly forces were loose in the world
to utilize their fears. This man was hated by the few. When he dies the people
burst into tears in the streets and their minds wailed, ‘What can we do now? How
can we go on without him?’
In
uncertainty I am certain that underneath their topmost layers of frailty men
want to be good and want to be loved. Indeed, most of their vices are attempted
short cuts to love. When a man comes to die, no matter what his talents and
influence and genius, if he dies unloved his life must be a failure to him and
his dying a cold horror. It seems to me that if you or I must choose between
two courses of through or action, we should remember our dying and try so to
live that our death brings no pleasure to the world.
We
have only one story. All novels, all poetry, are built on the never-ending
contest in ourselves of good and evil. And it occurs to me that evil must
constantly respawn, while good, while virtue, is immortal. Vice has always a
new fresh young face, while virtue is venerable as nothing else in the world is”
(pp 412-413.
“The
quick pain of truth can pass away, but the slow, eating agony of a lie is never
lost” (p 427).